📖About

PROBLEM. Archon's picture reviewer - the vision pass that renders every Logbook SVG and fixes overflow, overlap and clipping before publish - has not run on any recent blog. Observed twice on 2026-08-03, on both Logbook stories published that session; each published with an UNREVIEWED diagram and a log line reading ok=None rounds=1 skipped=vision_unavailable.

ROOT CAUSE. The gate is behaving correctly; the caller is not declared. By CAROL-INI-3494 the reviewer deliberately names NO payer and expects to inherit one from the work ticket in force, so that a diagram review bills whoever asked for the diagram. But the Author's publish path (tools/author_blog.py and shared/orion_logbook_backfill.py) opens no work ticket at all, so shared.media_spend.payer() resolves to None, track_of(None) resolves to no track, and undeclared-is-zero refuses the review. The work is real, budgeted work: the registry task constitution.story_published sits on the constitution-logbook track, owned by Orion.

SCOPE. 1. The Author's publish path runs inside a work ticket naming the Logbook story-publishing task, so the picture reviewer inherits the constitution-logbook track by construction (allocation by purpose, cookbook 1156). Covers the full-publish path AND the append-an-update-post path. 2. A review that could not run is reported as what it was: a spend REFUSAL is distinguished from vision-unavailable in the publish output, so a silent skip can never again read as a clean pass. 3. Check whether Scriber's Logbook author has the same undeclared-caller hole; fix it in the same change if so, or record that it does not.

OUT OF SCOPE. Any weakening of the media money gate. Its refusal is correct and stays.

⚖️Decisions

• Elrond's bypass methodology checklist (a reminder, not a gate -- you've got this): 0. File it requested_mode='bypass' (planner-vs-bypass is a deliberate choice). bypass_start REFUSES a non-bypass initiative (CAROL-INI-1846), and the dispatcher only skips the bypass lane when the mode says bypass -- a 'planner' mistag lets Merlin's pipeline grab the placeholder step and block your finished work. 1. Filed as planned status -- let the bypass claim/activate it; never file active. 2. Open the bypass (bypass_start) with your droid id + the remediation answer (remediates_initiative_id=NNN, or remediates_nothing=True). 3. Work the blocks for your work-type: template -> design -> code -> test -> review. Do the real work; record decisions on the initiative as you make them. 4. Reality is recorded for you at close -- code (files changed), each decision, and the twin-review verdict become real activities tied to this initiative and show in the Activity Tracker like a planner run (CAROL-INI-1840). No dummy rows. 5. Keep the initiative status moving; it parks in 'reviewing' and is tagged uat-pending for you at close (CAROL-INI-1836), so the stuck-watchdog leaves it alone until UAT. 6. Close runs the gates (design/architecture compliance + caller-audit). If a gate flags something pre-existing or unrelated to your change, waive it with a clear written rationale -- audit, don't skip. 7. Bypass skips the planner's auto-orchestration, NOT the standards. Same template checklist, same review, same observability as a planner run. (elrond)
• [status-router] planned -> executing | event=bypass_executing | bypass transition (or-bx-01)
• [delivery-check] 6 must-have criteria remain pending at bypass_end — delivery has no mechanical re-performance lane; UAT must grade on live evidence, not checklist silence (CAROL-INI-3020): (no detail) (orion)
• [status-router] executing -> reviewing | event=bypass_reviewing | bypass transition (or-bx-01)
• [status-router] reviewing -> closed | event=operator_signoff | Auto-accepted (CAROL-INI-1859): Orion-initiated, >2 days in reviewing with no objection. (el-srac-01)

✅Success criteria

• Publishing a Logbook story runs the picture reviewer: the publish output shows a real verdict (ok true or false with a round count), never a skip caused by a spend refusal. (must_have)
• The diagram review's cost lands on the Constitution Logbook track, so the work bills the job it serves instead of resolving to no track at all. (must_have)
• The append-an-update-post path is covered by the same work ticket, not only the full-publish path. (must_have)
• A review that cannot run reports WHY, distinguishing a spend refusal from vision-unavailable, so a skipped check can never read as a pass. (must_have)
• The media money gate is unchanged: a caller that declares nothing is still refused. (must_have)
• Scriber's Logbook author is checked for the same undeclared-caller hole, and the finding is recorded either way. (must_have)